IS (Intrinsically Safe) vs. NIS (Non-Intrinsically Safe) Cables: Comparison and Selection Guide
 
 
This guide provides a detailed comparison of IS (Intrinsically Safe) and NIS (Non-Intrinsically Safe) cables, covering their core differences, applicable scenarios, and selection criteria. Aligned with international standards (IEC, ATEX) and Chinese regulations (GB 3836, GB/T 19666), it helps engineers optimize cable selection for safety-critical environments.
1. Core Differences: Safety Design and Applications
| Feature | IS Cables | NIS Cables | 
|---|---|---|
| Explosion Protection | Limits circuit energy (current/voltage) to prevent sparks | No energy limitation design | 
| Applicable Environment | Hazardous areas (e.g., oil, chemical, mining) | Non-hazardous industrial/commercial areas | 
| International Standards | IEC 60079-11, ATEX | IEC 60227, IEC 60502 | 
| Chinese Standards | GB 3836.4, GB 3836.15 | GB/T 19666 (flame retardancy) | 
| Structural Requirements | Compact filling, optional shielding/armor | Standard construction | 
2. Key Selection Criteria: 5 Optimization Principles
- 
Risk Assessment - 
IS Cables: Mandatory for Zone 0/1/2 (flammable gases/dust). 
- 
NIS Cables: Restricted to non-hazardous areas (e.g., factories, offices). 
 
- 
- 
Structural Design - 
Compactness: Hazardous areas require circular, densely filled cables (core-to-sheath and core-to-core compaction) to prevent gas infiltration via "thermal pumping effects" (per GB 3836.15). 
- 
Shielding & Grounding: - 
Shielded cables require single-end grounding (equipment side) with resistance ≤4Ω. 
- 
Armored cables (e.g., IA-DJYPVP22) need armor-clamping devices for reliable grounding. 
 
- 
 
- 
- 
Material & Certification - 
IS Cables: Require IS parameter test reports (max current, voltage, capacitance, inductance) and system certifications (e.g., ATEX, IECEx). 
- 
NIS Cables: Must comply with flame retardancy (e.g., ZC class, GB/T 19666-2019) and general electrical standards. 
 
- 
- 
Compatibility Verification - 
IS cables must match device parameters (e.g., capacitance ≤ device tolerance) to avoid energy overload. 
 
- 
- 
Cost & Maintenance - 
IS Cables: Higher upfront cost but lower maintenance (safety prioritized). 
- 
NIS Cables: Cost-effective for non-explosive environments. 
 
- 
3. International Client Needs: Certifications & Documentation
- 
Quotation Requirements: Specify cable type (IS/NIS), specs (cross-section, voltage, shielding/armor), length, and standards (e.g., IEC, NEC). 
- 
Certification Documents: - 
IS Cables: Provide system-level explosion-proof certifications (ATEX/IECEx) and IS parameter test reports. 
- 
NIS Cables: Submit flame retardancy test reports (GB/T 19666) or IEC compliance declarations. 
 
- 
- 
Technical Support: Customized bilingual documents (datasheets, installation guides). 
4. FAQs
Q1: Do IS cables require shielding?
- 
Shielding is optional but recommended for high EMI environments (e.g., near inverters). Ensure single-end grounding. 
Q2: How to validate IS system safety?
- 
Submit IS parameter test reports (issued by CMA/CNAS-accredited labs) to confirm cable-device compatibility. 
Q3: Can NIS cables be used near chemical plants?
- 
Only in non-hazardous zones (e.g., control rooms). Hazardous areas mandate IS cables. 
5. Summary & Recommendations
- 
Choose IS Cables: High-risk explosive environments, ATEX/IECEx-certified projects. 
- 
Choose NIS Cables: General industrial/commercial setups with no explosion risks. 
- 
Certification Bodies: National Supervision and Inspection Center for Explosion Protection Equipment (China), TÜV Rheinland, SGS. 
Leave a Reply
- HYA 50×2×0.4 Communication Cable: Reliable Solution for Guangzhou Surveillance Systems
- Why Does Your EV Stop Charging Suddenly? Let’s Troubleshoot!
- Yuedao Intelligent Empowers Guangzhou Metro to Set World Record for Fastest Subway Speed
- Become Our Local Partner - Expand Your Market with High-Quality Cables & Wires
